The Bureaucracy of Denial: Problematizing Administrative Resistance to Acknowledging Harm
How Institutional Routines, Legalism, and Risk Aversion Conspire to Suppress Responsibility
Introduction
When harm occurs within public institutions—whether through neglect, mismanagement, or structural violence—one might expect a direct and sincere response: recognition, apology, redress. Yet in practice, what often follows is denial. This denial is rarely expressed in overt rejections of truth. More often, it takes the form of institutional silence, procedural obfuscation, or the slow erosion of urgency through administrative routine. This article examines how bureaucracies, far from being passive machines, actively participate in the suppression of responsibility. Through the lens of problematization, it explores how legal caution, risk-averse management, and routinized communication practices function together to produce a culture in which acknowledging harm becomes the greatest risk of all.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to In The Gray Lies The Truth to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.